MIDI: Musical Instrument Digital Interface

MIDI is a technical specification developed in the early 80s for control of electronic musical instruments such as synthesizers, drum machines, and samplers. Though developed as a manufacturing standard, it was collaboratively developed by instrument makers who were themselves musicians with considerable input from performers. MIDI was specifically designed to digitally encode and communicate many of the most recognizable and important aspects of music, like pitch, duration/time, and "velocity" (roughly equivalent to volume). However, MIDI was also designed specifically to be open-ended, and beyond a core set of controls, additional controls can be assigned to any function of a given hardware or software instrument or device. The openness of MIDI has given it life beyond musical instruments, and it has been used to control other humanities-relevant electronics like audio recording/mixing equipment and stage lighting, as well devices as far afield as microsurgery implements.

MIDI has had an enormous impact on musical performance, composition, and recording since its inception in the early 80s. First, it allows for the separation of performance and instrument. A performance can be recorded on any MIDI "controller" of essentially any form, hardware or software, or any combination of controllers — for example keyboards, rotary knobs, sliders, switches/buttons, joysticks, and even graphics tablets, laptop trackpads, and touchscreens. But the digitally recorded performance carries only performance information — the values of controllers in time — and no actual sound. A recorded MIDI performance can be sent to any MIDI-enabled instrument like a synthesizer or sampler at any time, separating a musician's performance from the sound of their instrument. Second, MIDI allows for the separation of composition and performance. In addition to recording a performance, MIDI information can be directly programmed, or "sequenced," separating the composer from the need for performers to realize a complex composition, even enabling compositions that would be physically impossible for human performers to execute. The programmability of MIDI also allows for the extension of chance-driven "aleatoric" composition methods like those developed by John Cage in the 1950s.

In full disclosure, I have a bit of an inside scoop with regard to MIDI. My little brother works at Sequential with Dave Smith, the "Father of MIDI," its co-inventor and co-recipient of the 2013 Technical Grammy for its development.

Comments

I also added this to the DH Group 3 Google doc, but for posterity's sake, I'm adding it here as well:

 

My primary focus will be on two ways in which MIDI, as a digital information format, allows for altered relationships between performance, composition, and instrument in music.

  • MIDI allows for the separation of performance and instrument. A performance can be recorded in real time with MIDI, but the “recording” consists of data streams — the values of various keys, knobs, switches, etc. in time. MIDI performance data can later be sent to other instruments and assigned to other controls on that instrument, for instance.
  • MIDI allows for the separation of composition and performance and/or instrument. MIDI can be directly programmed in addition to being performed, with the data sent to any hardware or software instrument at any time. Inhumanly complex or randomized compositions are made possible with MIDI programming.

   

A secondary focus will be on how MIDI’s designers wanted it to be an extremely open-ended specification/format so that instrument makers and users could be creative in ways never forseen by its creators. I would argue this openness is humanistic in and of itself, and has allowed MIDI to be used in areas outside of music.

  • The MIDI specification was patented, but the creators released it openly and required no fees for licensing its use or implementation, leading it to become an early example of an “open standard.” Anyone could access the technical specs of MIDI and use them for any purpose free of charge or constraints by the patent holders.
  • MIDI is so open-ended that it even allows for the separation of the format itself from its original purpose. The technical specification allows for virtually any electronic input or output device to send/receive signals. The only required data in MIDI are on/off, control identification number, and value (though essentially infinitely many more can be added to any device).
  • Because MIDI was open as a standard and open-ended as a communication format, MIDI was used to control early surgical robots, for instance, and it is still found in some automated manufacturing/industrial control settings.

 

I think the report will work best as a journalistic-type endeavor, though I still have a little flexibility to nail down the format. I think the 2nd stage of transforming the report into a video will be more engaging and a more appropriate medium for discussing MIDI.

Permalink

In reply to by delamb

  • The openness of MIDI has made it extraordinarily robust. This January (literally last week) was the 35th anniversary of MIDI’s official launch. After 35 years, MIDI is still in version 1.0 and used in billions of devices (most of which are cell phones that use MIDI for ringtones).